Oh, I have no doubt. Your and my interpretation of Charles and Erik have always been vastly different. But that's the beauty of characterization (and why I never use the phrase OOC). It's all biased by our experiences and perspectives.
It's interesting, though, because, for example, your view of Charles is so different from my own that I treat your Charles like an original character. That's not to say that either of us are right (subjectivity) but he's so different from my head canon. It's fascinating. Granted, I take 60% of my characterization from the comics, 20% from the animated series and the remaining 20% from a combination of XMFC and X1-3, so I'm pretty sure my Charles/Erik characterization is wildly different from the vast majority of the fandom.
Also, I think you're more of an Erik fangirl, yes? I'm a Charles girl.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Re: FILL: Everyday Love in Stockholm 139/?
Date: 2012-02-07 12:00 am (UTC)It's interesting, though, because, for example, your view of Charles is so different from my own that I treat your Charles like an original character. That's not to say that either of us are right (subjectivity) but he's so different from my head canon. It's fascinating. Granted, I take 60% of my characterization from the comics, 20% from the animated series and the remaining 20% from a combination of XMFC and X1-3, so I'm pretty sure my Charles/Erik characterization is wildly different from the vast majority of the fandom.
Also, I think you're more of an Erik fangirl, yes? I'm a Charles girl.