![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Disclaimer: After writing this, I sent it to the other mods and some friends of mine to check to make sure it didn't say anything problematic, but if they or I missed something important or said something wrong, please don't hesitate to let me know. I'm still learning.
Something's been brought to our attention in regards to language people have been using re: disability, and problematic depictions thereof. It's great that we have a character in this fandom who is disabled, and it's great that there is a lot of interest in writing about him! But there are people on this meme who are also disabled, and insensitive or simply ignorant words can really hurt them. As our goal with this meme is to maintain a space where everyone present can feel comfortable participating, we'd like to keep this from happening, and we hope you feel the same way.
You may have noticed that "ableism" has been added to the list of triggers to warn for. If you're not familiar with the word, it refers to any speech, action, or treatment that hurts, oppresses, or discriminates against disabled people. Words like "cripple" and "gimp" fall into this category. Prompts using these words (with a few exceptions, noted below) will be deleted. So do stories that depict Charles' disability as disgusting or unacceptable, or erase it completely. Language like “the crippled man”, “the disabled man”, and “the handicapped man” focuses on his disability, perpetuating the common mindset that disabled people are only disabled, and never have any other defining traits.
Now, we're not going to ask you to stop writing these stories, because this is a kink meme and it is not our business what you choose to ask for or write about. But we do ask that you warn for it, if you think your prompt or fill contains it. Wanting stories about Charles and Erik having acrobatic post-movie sex does not make you a bad person, but that doesn't really matter to someone with a disability who reads it and is hurt by that erasure. Taking the time to consider if your content could hurt someone is just the considerate thing to do.
Likewise, it’s entirely possible to write about ableism without taking part in it yourself -- for instance, depicting Charles dealing with being visibly different for the first time and showing the ways people treat him. Unless they are part of the prompt (“someone calls Charles a “cripple”, cue him defending himself/the team defending him”), ableist slurs are unnecessary; comments in which the prompter casually uses them to refer to a character are unacceptable. But no matter how you write about it, any ableist content needs a warning.
The mods will treat this as any other warning issue: if we see ableist language or actions in your fill or prompt (or it's called to our attention by someone else) and there is no warning, we will ask you to post it again with that warning and delete the offending prompt or fill. We'd rather not do this, so please just be aware of what you're writing so that we can all enjoy this meme.
Please also be aware that we are not perfect; if you find unwarned-for ableist content that we haven’t caught, please feel free to contact the poster or us about it.
So to clarify: I am asking you to either change your wordings or warn for your content. Not because of politics or what bothers you, but because this is a space for everyone to enjoy their kinks and it's courteous to let people know that you've written content that might upset them.
And appended: took "crazy" out of the post because it's not that relevant to the discussion and I was informed that lumping mental and physical disabilities together was a bit insensitive, which, yes, I see now. I am leaving the computer for a while; if I don't get to replying to you in a timely fashion, that's why.
One more edit. Someone suggested having a "choose not to warn" option. Is this something people can agree on/ are interested in? It's not ideal but it seems like a good compromise so that we can all get back to the meme.
Something's been brought to our attention in regards to language people have been using re: disability, and problematic depictions thereof. It's great that we have a character in this fandom who is disabled, and it's great that there is a lot of interest in writing about him! But there are people on this meme who are also disabled, and insensitive or simply ignorant words can really hurt them. As our goal with this meme is to maintain a space where everyone present can feel comfortable participating, we'd like to keep this from happening, and we hope you feel the same way.
You may have noticed that "ableism" has been added to the list of triggers to warn for. If you're not familiar with the word, it refers to any speech, action, or treatment that hurts, oppresses, or discriminates against disabled people. Words like "cripple" and "gimp" fall into this category. Prompts using these words (with a few exceptions, noted below) will be deleted. So do stories that depict Charles' disability as disgusting or unacceptable, or erase it completely. Language like “the crippled man”, “the disabled man”, and “the handicapped man” focuses on his disability, perpetuating the common mindset that disabled people are only disabled, and never have any other defining traits.
Now, we're not going to ask you to stop writing these stories, because this is a kink meme and it is not our business what you choose to ask for or write about. But we do ask that you warn for it, if you think your prompt or fill contains it. Wanting stories about Charles and Erik having acrobatic post-movie sex does not make you a bad person, but that doesn't really matter to someone with a disability who reads it and is hurt by that erasure. Taking the time to consider if your content could hurt someone is just the considerate thing to do.
Likewise, it’s entirely possible to write about ableism without taking part in it yourself -- for instance, depicting Charles dealing with being visibly different for the first time and showing the ways people treat him. Unless they are part of the prompt (“someone calls Charles a “cripple”, cue him defending himself/the team defending him”), ableist slurs are unnecessary; comments in which the prompter casually uses them to refer to a character are unacceptable. But no matter how you write about it, any ableist content needs a warning.
The mods will treat this as any other warning issue: if we see ableist language or actions in your fill or prompt (or it's called to our attention by someone else) and there is no warning, we will ask you to post it again with that warning and delete the offending prompt or fill. We'd rather not do this, so please just be aware of what you're writing so that we can all enjoy this meme.
Please also be aware that we are not perfect; if you find unwarned-for ableist content that we haven’t caught, please feel free to contact the poster or us about it.
So to clarify: I am asking you to either change your wordings or warn for your content. Not because of politics or what bothers you, but because this is a space for everyone to enjoy their kinks and it's courteous to let people know that you've written content that might upset them.
And appended: took "crazy" out of the post because it's not that relevant to the discussion and I was informed that lumping mental and physical disabilities together was a bit insensitive, which, yes, I see now. I am leaving the computer for a while; if I don't get to replying to you in a timely fashion, that's why.
One more edit. Someone suggested having a "choose not to warn" option. Is this something people can agree on/ are interested in? It's not ideal but it seems like a good compromise so that we can all get back to the meme.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-18 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-18 03:09 pm (UTC)(Um, you have some wonky HTML, though!)
no subject
Date: 2011-06-18 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-18 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-18 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-18 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-18 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-18 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-18 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-18 11:56 pm (UTC)Is every prompt or fill where Charles didn't get paralyzed going to be considered ableist now and deleted if they're not marked as such? What about prompts where Erik wasn't tortured and so never has PSTD? Is that unacceptably erasing HIS mental illness?
A big part of fanfic is wanting to rewrite the parts that upset us into something we'd rather see instead. Look at all the requests for an AU where the "divorce" never happened. Shaming or condemning people who want a different outcome because such a desire "isn't right" is the first step on the road to kink- and fantasy-policing.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-19 12:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-19 12:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-19 12:20 am (UTC)However, I am open to discussion and suggestion. If I'm totally wrong on this, I'll change it.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-19 12:24 am (UTC)No.
This is a kink meme. You can request whatever you want and I will not police that. What I am asking is that you think about if the wording your prompt could hurt someone. "Acrobatic post-movie sex" is not a hurtful thing to request. "Pretend Charles' injury never happened or happened differently because I don't want to read about it" is. Just keep it in mind and warn for it if it comes up, that's all I ask.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-19 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-19 12:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-19 12:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-19 12:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-19 12:39 am (UTC)Sorry, I'm not going to apologize for wanting the movie to turn out differently. I'm not sure what wording would be acceptable when apparently my very desire to see a non-disabled Charles is considered ableist.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-19 12:41 am (UTC)so, i'm glad that it doesn't bother you: more power to you. but it does have a terrible history behind it of stigmatizing the mentally ill and making them subhuman.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-19 12:42 am (UTC)However, the point of warnings is that you might not have a problem with the content, but someone else might, and that someone else is who the warning is for. I'm not asking you to change your content -- just warn for it.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-19 12:45 am (UTC)I'm going to add this to the post: "I'm asking you to either change your wording or warn for your content." Is that clear enough, do you think?
no subject
Date: 2011-06-19 12:47 am (UTC)Why is it acceptable as an adjective but not a noun?
Why is "the disabled man/the man in the wheelchair" going to be policed and deleted when other epithets ("the tall man," "the German") will not? What if it's a story told from the point of view of someone who would notice that feature of Charles first and think of him that way after?
Are you guys going to be reading through every fill and policing every mention of Charles's disability or lack thereof? Why is the priority suddenly on making this place a safe space for people with disabilities instead of any other feature? Isn't deciding a kink meme should be a safe space in terms of subjective content an extremely slippery slope? Can't there just be a general warning that there might be erasing of disabilities (and divorces) for the sake of kink?
no subject
Date: 2011-06-19 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-19 12:55 am (UTC)This kink meme is not a safe space. I am merely asking people to be courteous, which is apparently too much for some people to handle. There is absolutely no way I can be everywhere at once and read every comment, even with the whole mod team. Adding a warning takes seconds, it's not that hard, I don't understand why it's such an issue.
I don't want to delete comments. I would rather do pretty much anything than have to resort to that. But I also don't want people to feel they can't come here because they don't know what to expect, and if everyone just uses their judgement and leaves warnings where necessary, then there's no issue.
And as for What if it's a story told from the point of view of someone who would notice that feature of Charles first and think of him that way after?, I'm only asking you to warn for it. That's all.